The Debate Over Quality Versus Quantity

SHARE THIS +

I’d be honored if you’d consider “liking” my Facebook page, or subscribing to my RSS Feed. Or better yet, receive some Love straight to your inbox by entering your email in that box to the right! Love is way better than junk mail!

quality-over-quantity The two main places I worked at during my career in the fashion industry, were high end and/or designer labels that concentrated a majority of their manufacturing here in the US. If they had their factories elsewhere, they were run by the parent company and paid American wages, or were fastidiously researched to ensure healthy and quality work conditions. One company charged over $500 for a pair of their pants, and the other company charged upwards of $85 for a T-Shirt. To the average price conscious person, the prices seemed aspirational at best, ridiculous at worst.

From my works behind the scenes though I got to see why we charged $500 for a pair of pants. The wool was sheared from our own dedicated farm of sheep grown in the bountiful hills of Transylvania. It was brought here and cleaned and scoured for hours, then spun on machines that we had purchased and owned in our own manufacturing plants in Irvine, CA. The knit was then dyed by hand in-house to ensure consistent color and quality, and fluffed for hours that resulted in a soft, airy feel to the wool. The knit was then woven into blankets that were hand sewn by skilled seamstresses, again in our own manufacturing plants. An average garment took 10 hours from start to finish to complete, and many of those hours were spent in the hands of workers, making California minimum wage. You can start to do the math and see how the dollars started adding up. I got very, very skilled at being not only able to defend our $500 price tag for a pair of pants, but justify it as well, to anyone that thought we were high on crack.

The T-Shirt place I worked at was much the same. The use of quality cotton, dyed and manufactured in LA, QC’ed in our LA factories, and so on. Some items were outsourced to China, as was the case with the fancy designer place I worked for, but it was always the last alternative and it was usually for woven garments. China has the market on making quality wovens, and manufacturers here in the US can rarely compete.

All this to say that when people talk about quality versus quantity, I can usually nod my head in earnest agreement. But here’s the thing, most of us can’t afford that kind of quality. While we would love to say that our wool garments come from happy happy sheep in Transylvania, most of us have very ordinary jobs and lives that not only don’t need fancy sheep’s wool, but just can’t afford it. So what do the rest of us do that want quality but can’t afford real fancy quality?

Well I’m still trying to figure it out. I’d like to think that if you spend a bit more and avoid consistently shopping at places like Target and Forever 21 for your wardrobe, you’re good. But the plain truth is that even places like Banana Republic, J. Crew and even Zara offers the disguise of quality wrapped up in a pretty label and glossy ad campaigns. My $89 J. Crew white button down just shrunk at least 2 sizes after hand washing it, and the “quality” shoes I bought for Taylor at Nordstrom, that set me back almost $50 just lost 2 jewels in less than 3 months of wear. The nice thing though about both of those experiences is that I know I can take them back and (I did), and both companies offer a return or exchange, along with a sincere apology. I once tried returning a sweater to Forever 21 that unraveled with one wear and zero washing, and the manager almost laughed me out of the store. She referred to their return policy and basically said, “don’t you know our stuff is crap? It’s the chance you take when you spend $9 for a sweater.” Touche and shame on me.

Good quality that is still within reach is not impossible to find and I’m trying to be better about doing my research first, and being very selective with what I buy and how I spend my money. I needed some new workout gear and so asked for a gift card to Lululemon for Christmas, and bought my first No Limits tank, and man do I love that thing. At $64 a pop I better love it right? The price is what I like to call, crazy stupid expensive, but the company has a minimum 5 year quality guarantee and they are committed to social and environmental responsibility, which I wholeheartedly appreciate. I posted a picture of it on Instagram this morning, and a friend advised me that Old Navy has a very similar tank for sale. I got very excited for a few minutes thinking I could own 5 of those tanks for the cost of 1 Lululemon tank, but do I really want 5 of something decent when I can have 1 of something very excellent?

It’s a question I wrestle with quite often. This weekend, I’m going to finally delve into the book Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost Of Cheap Fashion, and see if I can form a more concrete opinion and strategy. I’ll report back with what I think of the book. Overall though in the last couple of years I have tried to stick to buying less, buying more classic pieces, and investing in what appears to be better pieces in those classics. And if I get the occasional bad apple, I’ve been trying to limit my purchases at stores that stand behind their quality and will gladly return an item if there is a problem. I am also trying to concern myself less and less with trends and fast fashion, since that is where I can get caught up in buying the cheap for one season mentality. It’s a work in progress though, since after all, I am still a sucker for some trends. And the occasional purchase from Target, like a killer leopard skirt, never hurt anyone, right? The older I get though, I try to remember that I’d rather be a slave to my savings account and my checkbook, than a slave to fashion. Remember that moment when Carrie Bradshaw realized that she had enough for the down payment on her apartment that she needed, sitting right in her very own closet, stacked with Louboutins? I don’t want that to ever be my life story.

So when do you decide to debunk quality for quantity, or at least for a lesser price? Is it on trend items, workout gear, seasonal items? When do you decide to bite the bullet and pay up for something you hope will last you longer? And while we all love to hold onto the ideal of quality versus quantity, when and how often do we really live by that motto and sacrifice and save to get there? I know I don’t nearly enough.



Andrea is the founder of For The Love Of, a lifestyle blog dedicated to approachable, modern living. She writes about style, her love of DIY, and living a healthier life through wholesome, nutritious cooking. She is also a regular contributor at Babble. Get in touch: Facebook, Twitter You can find Andrea on Instagram @andreavhowe and @gwynethmademedoit

  • Susan G says:

    This is tough. I do buy things at Target (like a leopard print skirt), but I always spend a lot on shoes. I wear very high-heeled pumps five days a week and spend a decent amount on my shoes, so they will last and mostly so they are comfortable. (Not Louboutins, but generally in the 150-200 range if I can’t get them on sale.) With clothes I’m not sure sometimes how to determine what is quality and what is overpriced because of a label. I do like to buy from companies that will stand behind their clothing, and so that is something to remind myself to pay attention to.

    • Andrea says:

      The leopard skirt, of course! I went back and added an aside note about that leopard skirt in fact, thanks to you! I’m with you, I cannot buy cheap shoes. Definitely not the designer $600/pair kind, but I do spend on average $100 for a pair of shoes. Quality, nice looking and comfortable shoes are very important to me and I think an important part of an outfit. You can be wearing a Target skirt, but if you have a decent pair of shoes on as well, it elevates the whole the whole look. Oh and I’m so glad you ordered a Clarisonic. I hope you love it as much as I do!

  • It’s funny you should write this now. One of my goals for 2013 was to get a conscience about some of my buying choices — namely, clothing. For me, it was not only the quality vs. quantity issue but also about supporting American jobs and the environmental impact of creating so much waste. My first order was reading Overdressed. I’ll be interested to hear what you have to say, because I walked away feeling guilty about every possible buying choice I could make. It’s hard having a conscience, I guess. I’ll be staying tuned…

  • Bryony says:

    I have to agree: this one is difficult. And it’s something I’ve been trying to pay more attention to, lately. I try to spend more to get quality in things like my jeans: which I wear basically every day. I’m picky about fit & dye, & I need them to be durable, so it’s a big-deal purchase for me. I’ll also aim for quality in my nice dresses or my bras…though I do always try to catch them on sale.

    For cheap & easy? Leggings, tights, earrings, or the occasional pair of flats. If it only gets infrequent wear & tear, I’m not fussed.

    This is the second time I’ve heard the book Overdressed mentioned in the blogs I read: I’ll have to search it out after your review!

  • Melissa says:

    If it makes you feel any better about your lululemon top, I bought my first pair of lululemon pants about 6 years ago, and they’re still alive and kicking. So much money for a pair of workout pants but so worth it, considering the gazillion times I’ve worn them.

    • Susan G says:

      [Sorry – meant to reply to Jules below!]Ha! You and my husband are cut from the same (high quality) cloth. He bought me my first Coach purses years ago when they were leather with solid brass details, and no logo. And stopped when my middle school daughter and her friends wanted them. 🙂 I do still buy expensive purses, but only use one at a time (I hate changing purses) so I carry it for a few years and then replace it. And talking Kate Spade/Ann Taylor/Talbots level, not super high end.

  • Jules says:

    I would love to buy lululemon, but I stuck with Old Navy this time. This is only my first year really working out, and I wasn’t going to spend that kind of money on something I secretly thought I would flake out on. I’ve done so well, that I’m confident I can justify the purchase of quality workout gear next year.

    I’m also not fond of luxury purses, and I never buy status bags. Coach is out of the question for me. I wore the brand years ago when no one knew who they were. Then, one day I saw a girl from Hot Dog on a Stick leaving her shift carrying a Coach purse. That’s when I realized some labels are more ego than quality, and I haven’t gone near Coach in…10 years? I guess I’m as obnoxious as label lovers, but in a different way. The second “they” tell me I need brand ABC to be cool, I don’t want it.

  • Cate says:

    Your lulu tank will last you forever- although since they stopped making things here the quality has gone down some- so I wouldn’t consider $64 much at all. It’s always a toss up for me and the intangible of perception and strategy of pricepoint is a factor. While I would easily pay for one of their tanks at that price point I have yet to (crazy, I know!) pop up $ 120 for one of their iconic hoodies. I live on Vanvouver where the sidewalks are plugged with them.

  • I love this post! I am all about buying staple pieces that last (quality shirts, jeans, jackets), and purchasing trendy items that I know will only make it one season at someplace like Target or Forever21. But you are so right, you have to really do your research to find out what places offer true quality. I didn’t know you could return to J.Crew after wash/wear – I’m sticking that in my back pocket… 🙂

  • […] tank! (Also $12 right now. Score!) Lots of cute patterns and a bunch are even just $11. I read a post this week about how it is much better to have one $60 Lululemon tank top than six cheap Old Navy tank tops. […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*